A CONCISE CRITIQUE OF ROBERT WRIGHT’S BOOK
“THE EVOLUTION OF GOD”
(By Dr. Peter P. Ventura, B.Th., M.Th., D.R. E., Ph.D.)
Wright relied on the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible. And there you have it in a nutshell, the blind leading the blind (Lk. 6:39).
Wright’s introductory statement, “I was once denounced from the pulpit of my mother’s church…[by] the pastor of the First Baptist Church in Santa Rosa, California…” (pg. 3), becomes the undergirding for one of the most laughable, apostate, and blasphemous works authored to date.
Moreover, the book itself is over five hundred pages, thus, it is not possible to address the plethora of theological error contained therein. While it is plausible that Wright’s fairy tale may have some historical value with regard to primitive tribes, at best, even that seems marginal.
When reading Chapter two, “Polytheism, the Religion of Ancient Israel” subtitle, “God in the flesh” (pg. 103), Wright begins by displaying his ignorance of Scripture application with a glaring attack on the Word of God as found in the King James Authorized Bible. In Wright’s quest to prove the God of Israel and Christianity “evolved” over a vast period of human history, Wright argues, “The Bible…talks more than once about a “divine council” in which God takes a seat…” (pg. 105). Thus, the Almighty God of Israel and Christianity (Bible Believers), is one, among many gods.
Wright depicts God Almighty as a member of some heavenly council, based upon Gen. 1:26-27, specifically, “And God said, Let us make man in our image…” (vs. 26), and, “So God created man in his own image…” (vs. 27).
Wright doesn’t get it, and asks his readers, “Us? Who is us?” (pg. 105). Wright doesn’t get it, He wont get it. He can’t get it because, well, let the Apostle Paul explain, “…the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Cor. 2:14). Thank you, Apostle Paul.
Another reason why Wright does not get the “US” of Gen. 1:26 and 27, is his use of apostate biblical sources. Because Wright does not speak Hebrew, Greek or Arabic, Wright relied on the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible. And there you have it in a nutshell, the blind leading the blind (Lk. 6:39).
Wright’s alleged scholarly thesis is derived from a Bible translation which relies upon two of the most corrupt manuscripts known to mankind, Codex Sinaiticus (Aleph), and Codex Vaticanus (B). Both manuscripts were available and rejected by the King James Bible translation committee(s), (See: “A note on Translation pg. 484, Wright).
Let us examine the “US” of Gen. 1:26 and 27, that has Wright in a tailspin. The “US” of Gen. 1:26 and 27 is, God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. The God of Israel, Jehovah is understood right from the beginning verse of the Bible, Gen. 1:1, as a plurality. I am not refuting the fact that the nation of Israel strayed and worshiped all kinds of man and demonic made “gods”, from money, homes, automobiles, to planets and people. Merely because one labels them “gods” does not make them the true God (“…we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one” (1 Cor. 8:4; See: vss. 3-6).
The Bible opens with, “In the beginning God…” (Gen. 1:1). The Hebrew word for God is “Elohim”, a plurality. The “im” in Hebrew signifies a plural use of the word, e.g., Cherub (singular), and Churbim (plural). Thus, Gen. 1:1 opens the Bible by giving notice to the reader that, God is a plurality from the “beginning” when God created the Heaven and the Earth. Not many “gods”, but one God who is plural in His divine nature, a tripartite God.
To further understand the plural nature of the one true God, a look at the Hebrew “Shema” will help. Deu. 6:4 reads: “Hear O Israel: the LORD our God is one LORD.” The Hebrew word used here for “one”, is Echad = Plural. However, the singular word for the Hebrew word “one” is Yachid. One only need to compare the use of the Echad (one), “plural” in Gen. 34:16; Ex. 24:3; 25:36; Jer. 32:39; Ez. 37:17; Gen. 1:5; Ezra 2:64, with the use of Yachid (singular) in Gen. 22:2, 2, 16; Jdgs. 11:34; Prov. 4:3; Jer. 6:26; Amos 8:10; Zec. 12:10.
This same plurality of the divine Godhead can be seen in Zec. 12. In vs. 4 “saith the LORD” (Jehovah), the Lord speaking. Vs. 6 “I will” the LORD. Vs. 10 “the LORD whom they have pierced”. The Apostle John, speaking of the prophetic aspect of Jesus Christ’s crucifixion wrote, “And again another Scripture saith, “They shall look on him whom they have pierced” (Jn. 19:37 (See: Rev. 1:7)).
Never, ever, did a Sound Doctrine Jew or Christian ever believe Jehovah God was one of many gods who sat with other gods in a heavenly council. Isaiah prophesied, “Thus saith the LORD [Jehovah] the king of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God” (Isa. 44:6). How spiritually enlightening to know that Jesus Christ is God manifest in the flesh. Jesus Christ said, “… Fear not; I am the first and the last:” (Rev. 1:17); (See: 1 Tim. 3:16).
No Sound Doctrine Jew or Christian understands the Godhead as 1+1+1= 3 separate gods. What the Sound Doctrine Jew and Christian understands the Godhead to be is one God who in eternity past, in order to fulfill His eternal purpose, divided Himself into three persons depicted in Scripture as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And when the eternal purpose of God Almighty is finished in eternity future, God will once again become a singular “that God may be all in all” (1 Cor. 15:28). It is in the transitive property of equality: A = B, B = C, so A = C, herein the sound doctrine Bible Believer understands the eternal purpose, and Godhead. Even Job, written about 1,500 B.C. by Elihu (Job 32:16), records Job saying, “For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:” (Job 19:25).
This concise critique of Wright’s fairy tale is well justified with a conclusion quoted from Wright’s own introduction, as follows: “How far I [Wright] have fallen!...Now, nearly three decades later, another Baptist Minister [is] placing me [Wright] in the general vicinity of Satan” (pg. 3).
_____________________________
Wright, Robert; The Evolution of God; Little, Brown, Co.: NY, NY. 2009.
By Peter P. Ventura
His playlist on BBT
See his other post on BBT
You will find Michael Heiser talking about more or less the same nonsense as "The Evolution of God" (as if God ever went through transformation. His Name is I AM THAT I AM.)